Endometrial development and function in experimentally induced luteal phase deficiency

RS Usadi, JM Groll, BA Lessey… - The Journal of …, 2008 - academic.oup.com
RS Usadi, JM Groll, BA Lessey, RA Lininger, RJ Zaino, MA Fritz, SL Young
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2008academic.oup.com
Context: It is generally assumed that delayed endometrial development observed in luteal
phase deficiency (LPD) is the result of abnormally low progesterone (P) levels. This
hypothesis has never been tested by direct experiment. Objective: Our objective was to
evaluate the effects of P concentrations on human endometrium. Design and Setting: A
randomized trial was conducted at an academic medical center. Subjects: Twenty-nine
healthy, ovulatory 18-to 35-yr-old women participated. Intervention: Endometrial samples …
Context: It is generally assumed that delayed endometrial development observed in luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is the result of abnormally low progesterone (P) levels. This hypothesis has never been tested by direct experiment.
Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of P concentrations on human endometrium.
Design and Setting: A randomized trial was conducted at an academic medical center.
Subjects: Twenty-nine healthy, ovulatory 18- to 35-yr-old women participated.
Intervention: Endometrial samples were obtained from women in natural cycles and two groups of experimentally modeled cycles. Women undergoing modeled cycles were treated with GnRH agonist and a fixed physiological dose of transdermal estradiol, followed by randomization to 10 or 40 mg daily im P administration to achieve either normal circulating luteal P or 4-fold lower P concentrations, the latter representing an experimental model of LPD.
Main Outcome Measures: Tissue specimens, obtained after 10 days of P exposure, were analyzed by histological dating, immunohistochemistry, immunoblot, and real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).
Results: Histological dating of endometrium, immunohistochemistry for endometrial integrins, and qRT-PCR analysis for nine putative functional markers showed no differences between the three groups. Preliminary data from Western analysis suggest that some proteins may be affected by low serum P concentrations.
Conclusions: Histological endometrial dating does not reflect circulating P concentrations and cannot serve as a reliable bioassay of the quality of luteal function. Assessment of selected functional markers by either immunohistochemistry or qRT-PCR is similarly insensitive to decreased circulating P. Preliminary evidence suggests that abnormally low luteal phase serum P concentrations may have important functional consequences not otherwise detected.
Oxford University Press